Indian J Pharm Close
 

Figure 2: Changes in (a) redness, (b) erythema, (c) scales, and (d) cumulative score in the extract of Woodfordia fruticosa-treated mice. The results represent mean ± standard error of mean for 6 mice per group. Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons test, values were considered significant at *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01, a-significant difference as compared to Group I, b-significant difference as compared to Group II

Figure 2: Changes in (a) redness, (b) erythema, (c) scales, and (d) cumulative score in the extract of <i>Woodfordia fruticosa</i>-treated mice. The results represent mean ± standard error of mean for 6 mice per group. Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons test, values were considered significant at *<i>P</i> < 0.05 and **<i>P</i> < 0.01, a-significant difference as compared to Group I, b-significant difference as compared to Group II