|Year : 2015 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 143-147
Single dose intravenous methyl prednisolone versus oral prednisolone in Bell's palsy: A randomized controlled trial
Prithvi Giri, Ravindra Kumar Garg, Maneesh Kumar Singh, Rajesh Verma, Hardeep Singh Malhotra, Praveen Kumar Sharma
Department of Neurology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
|Date of Submission||03-Nov-2014|
|Date of Decision||21-Nov-2014|
|Date of Acceptance||11-Feb-2015|
|Date of Web Publication||17-Mar-2015|
Ravindra Kumar Garg
Department of Neurology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Objectives: Corticosteroids have been used in the treatment of Bell's palsy and several other postinfectious neurological conditions. We hypothesized that administration of a single dose of intravenous (IV) methylprednisolone might be an effective alternative to oral prednisolone.
Materials and Methods: In this open label, randomized trial, patients with acute Bell's palsy were randomized into two groups. One group received single dose (500 mg) of IV methylprednisolone while the other group received 10 days of oral prednisone. Outcome was assessed at 1 and 3 months with House-Brackmann scale.
Results: At 3 months, 93 (79.48%) patients had completely recovered. IV methylprednisolone and oral prednisolone groups had similar recovery rates (80% vs. 78.33%, P > 0.05). Patients with Grade 2 and 3 recovered completely. In patients with Grade 6, the recovery rate was 20%. A better outcome was observed if corticosteroids were administered within 3 days of onset of palsy.
Conclusion: Intravenous methylprednisolone and oral prednisolone showed equivalent benefit in patients with acute Bell's palsy.
Keywords: Corticosteroids, facial nerve, methylprednisolone
|How to cite this article:|
Giri P, Garg RK, Singh MK, Verma R, Malhotra HS, Sharma PK. Single dose intravenous methyl prednisolone versus oral prednisolone in Bell's palsy: A randomized controlled trial. Indian J Pharmacol 2015;47:143-7
|How to cite this URL:|
Giri P, Garg RK, Singh MK, Verma R, Malhotra HS, Sharma PK. Single dose intravenous methyl prednisolone versus oral prednisolone in Bell's palsy: A randomized controlled trial. Indian J Pharmacol [serial online] 2015 [cited 2021 Feb 25];47:143-7. Available from: https://www.ijp-online.com/text.asp?2015/47/2/143/153419
| » Introduction|| |
Bell's palsy is the most common cause of acute facial nerve paralysis. Even though it is a benign and self-limiting disease, in many patients it can lead to significant physical, social and psychological morbidity. ,,, A variety of treatment options has been tried with varying results. It has been postulated that Bell's palsy occurs as an inflammatory reaction to viral infection. However, the role of antiviral drugs is controversial. ,,,,, Corticosteroids, currently, remain the single most important treatment option. , Bell's palsy, usually, occur rapidly, and any pharmacological intervention is difficult. Intravenous (IV) corticosteroids are of proven value in similar acute inflammatory neurological illness such as multiple sclerosis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis and transverse myelitis. Hence, it is worthwhile to study the value of IV corticosteroids vis-à-vis oral corticosteroids. In this study, we compared the efficacy of a single dose of 500 mg of IV methylprednisolone with a 10 days oral prednisolone regime on recovery of patients with Bell's palsy.
| » Materials and Methods|| |
The study was designed as an open labeled, randomized controlled trial. The study was conducted between August 2011 and October 2013. Patients were enrolled from the outdoor services of the Department of Neurology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India. Institutional Ethics Committee approved the study. Informed consent was taken from all the patients before inclusion in the study.
We recruited adult patients with unilateral acute facial palsy of no identifiable cause, within 1-week of onset.
Patients with any of the following conditions were excluded: pregnancy, diabetes, severe hypertension, renal or hepatic disease, gastric or duodenal ulcer, presence of acute otitis media or ipsilateral chronic otitis, recent head injury, psychiatric disease or any other condition where the use of corticosteroids was contraindicated.
Randomization and Treatment Allocation
The patients were divided into two groups, according to a pre-generated computerized randomization table. Patients in group 1 received a single dose of 500 mg of IV infusion of methylprednisolone while those in group 2 received oral prednisolone in a tapering dosage schedule (60 mg daily for initial 5 days, tapered by 10 mg daily over next 5 days).
Follow-up and Outcome Assessment
All patients were followed for a minimum of 3 months after inclusion, and the outcome analysis was done at 1-month and at 3 months. Cut-off at 1-month and 3 months were used to study the short-term recovery patterns, defined as recovery occurring in <4 months.  The primary outcome was assessed using the House-Brackmann grading system for facial nerve function, which assigns patients to 1 of 6 categories. Grade 1 indicates normal function, while Grade 6 indicates no facial function. Intermediate severity grades were defined as slight (Grade 2), moderate (Grade 3), moderately severe (Grade 4) and severe (Grade 5) depending upon the loss of tone, magnitude of weakness, and presence of synkinesis, contracture or hemifacial spasm.  Patients were also advised to communicate telephonically or report immediately in case of any serious adverse event. Possible adverse events were evaluated at each study visit. Assessment of the patients was carried out on the basis of grade of palsy as well as early (≤3 days) versus late (between 4 and 7 days) initiation of treatment regimes. Final outcome was measured in terms of complete recovery of the facial nerve function (Grade 1 of House-Brackmann grading system) at 3 months.
The results were expressed as percentage and mean ± standard deviation. The Chi-square Fisher exact test, where ever applicable, was used to compare the dichotomous variables. The Chi-square for trend analysis was used to compare categorical variables. The unpaired t-test was used to compare continuous variables. P < 0.05 was considered as significant. All the analyses were carried out using SPSS version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
| » Results|| |
During the study period, we screened 151 patients with Bell's palsy. Twenty-seven patients were excluded out of whom 14 patients had been initiated on corticosteroids, 9 on antiviral treatment, and 4 patients had a known contraindication to corticosteroids. Finally, 124 patients were enrolled in the study. At 3 months, 7 patients were lost to follow-up and 117 patients were subjected to outcome analysis [Figure 1]. All the baseline parameters under study were comparable between two groups [Table 1].
|Table 1: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with Bell's palsy|
Click here to view
After 1-month of treatment, 31 (54.38%) patients from group 1 and 23 (38.33%) from group 2 recovered completely; a total of 54 (46.16%) patients thus recovered completely. The patients treated with IV methylprednisolone and oral prednisolone, both, showed improvement in the symptoms. The results were however statistically nonsignificant when compared between the two groups.
After 3 months of treatment, 46 (80.7%) patients from group 1 and 47 (38.33%) from group 2 recovered completely; a total of 93 (79.48%) patients recovered completely. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two treatment group.
Sub Group Analysis
According to grade of palsy
After 1-month, patients with facial palsy (Grade 2 and 3) showed early and complete recovery. All patients of Grade 2 and 3 recovered completely while only 55% and 32.2% patients in Grade 4 and Grade 5, respectively, showed complete recovery. No meaningful recovery was observed in patients with Grade 6 Bell's palsy.
After 3 months, trends of recovery almost converged in terms of the difference in the two groups. In Grade 6, only 1 (20%) patient from group 1 showed complete recovery [Table 2].
|Table 2: Outcome assessment (complete recovery to grade 1) at 1-month and 3 months between the two groups in different grades|
Click here to view
According to the initiation of treatment
The patients were also analyzed according to early (≤3 days) versus late (between 4 and 7 days) initiation of treatment based upon their time of arrival for the treatment. In the methylprednisolone group, at 1-month, 58.33% patients (early group) and 47.61% patients (late group) had complete recovery. At 3 months, 83.33% and 76.19% patients in the two respective group had complete recovery.
In oral prednisolone group, at 1-month, 40% patients (early group) and 34.78% patients (late group) had complete recovery, while at 3 months 81% and 73.91% patients, respectively, had complete recovery. A trend toward better recovery with early institution of treatment (IV or oral) was observed where IV methylprednisolone was found to be better than oral prednisolone, but the difference was not statistically significant.
None of the patients in either treatment groups reported any adverse event during the study period.
| » Discussion|| |
This study evaluated the efficacy of a single dose IV methylprednisolone versus oral prednisolone. We observed that a single dose administration of IV methylprednisolone is as effective as 10 days treatment with oral prednisolone in patients with acute Bell's palsy. Treatment options for patients of Bell's palsy are aimed to facilitate functional recovery. Treatment options include corticosteroids and antiviral drugs, alone or in combination. Even without treatment, a large number of patients (approximately 70%) recover completely within 6 months and approximately 30% of patients may not recover completely. , We noted that approximately 80% patients recovered completely at 3 months of treatment with either IV methylprednisolone or oral prednisolone. Intravenous methylprednisolone resulted in nonsignificantly better functional recovery rate especially at 1-month when assessed against oral prednisolone and in terms of early institution of treatment (≤3 days). Combined treatment with a corticosteroid and an antiviral agent has been shown to be more effective in treating severe to complete Bell's palsy than corticosteroid treatment alone.  Physical therapy appears to be effective only in the more severe Bell's palsy, whereas less severe Bell's palsy might result in complete spontaneous recovery, regardless of physical therapy. 
We showed that grade of Bell's palsy (severity) is the most important prognostic determinant for recovery. Our results are similar to those reported by Sullivan et al. who found that patients with facial palsy of lower grades had a better outcome .  Grade 6 patients infrequently had complete recovery. In patients with Bell's palsy, early treatment with prednisolone significantly improves the chances of complete recovery at 3 and 9 months . Consistent with these findings; our results also suggested that treatment of Bell's palsy should be commenced promptly.
In majority number of patients, facial nerve spontaneously and completely recovers. The limitation of our study was the non-inclusion of a control group owing to an ethical concern of depriving patients of a recommended form of treatment. , The study was targeted to look for short-term recovery patterns; an extension to 6 months would have provided more details of patients with incomplete recovery or those in the process of recuperation.
A multicentric double-blind study, with a longer follow-up, may be done to study the efficacy of the two corticosteroids. A 5 days regimen of IV methylprednisolone, for severe Bell's palsy, also needs to be investigated.
| » Conclusion|| |
Single dose of 500 mg of IV methylprednisolone may be an equally efficacious alternative to a 10 days course of oral prednisolone. Early institution of treatment should be attempted for optimum results.
| » References|| |
Peitersen E. Bell's palsy: The spontaneous course of 2,500 peripheral facial nerve palsies of different etiologies. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2002 ;549:4-30.
Yanagihara N. Incidence of Bell's palsy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1988;137:3-4.
Murthy JM, Saxena AB. Bell's palsy: Treatment guidelines. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2011;14:S70-2.
Neely JG, Neufeld PS. Defining functional limitation, disability, and societal limitations in patients with facial paresis: Initial pilot questionnaire. Am J Otol 1996;17:340-2.
Theil D, Arbusow V, Derfuss T, Strupp M, Pfeiffer M, Mascolo A, et al.
Prevalence of HSV-1 LAT in human trigeminal, geniculate, and vestibular ganglia and its implication for cranial nerve syndromes. Brain Pathol 2001;11:408-13.
Gussen R. Pathogenesis of Bell's palsy. Retrograde epineurial edema and postedematous fibrous compression neuropathy of the facial nerve. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1977;86:549-58.
Lockhart P, Daly F, Pitkethly M, Comerford N, Sullivan F. Antiviral treatment for Bell's palsy (idiopathic facial paralysis). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009 ;4:CD001869.
Gök U, Alpay HC, Akpolat N, Yoldas T, Kilic A, Yilmaz B, et al.
Comparisons of steroid, acyclovir, lipoprostoglandin E1 and steroid+acyclovir treatments in facial paralysis: A rat study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2005;69:1199-204.
Furuta Y, Ohtani F, Chida E, Mesuda Y, Fukuda S, Inuyama Y. Herpes simplex virus type 1 reactivation and antiviral therapy in patients with acute peripheral facial palsy. Auris Nasus Larynx 2001;28 Suppl: S13-7.
Worster A, Keim SM, Sahsi R, Pancioli AM, Best Evidence in Emergency Medicine (BEEM) Group. Do either corticosteroids or antiviral agents reduce the risk of long-term facial paresis in patients with new-onset Bell's palsy? J Emerg Med 2010;38:518-23.
de Almeida JR, Al Khabori M, Guyatt GH, Witterick IJ, Lin VY, Nedzelski JM, et al.
Combined corticosteroid and antiviral treatment for Bell palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2009;302:985-93.
Gronseth GS, Paduga R, American Academy of Neurology. Evidence-based guideline update: Steroids and antivirals for Bell palsy: Report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2012;79:2209-13.
House JW, Brackmann DE. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985;93:146-7.
Engström M, Berg T, Stjernquist-Desatnik A, Axelsson S, Pitkäranta A, Hultcrantz M, et al.
Prednisolone and valaciclovir in Bell's palsy: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:993-1000.
Baugh RF, Basura GJ, Ishii LE, Schwartz SR, Drumheller CM, Burkholder R, et al.
Clinical practice guideline: Bell's palsy executive summary. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;149:656-63.
Lee HY, Byun JY, Park MS, Yeo SG. Steroid-antiviral treatment improves the recovery rate in patients with severe Bell's palsy. Am J Med 2013;126:336-41.
Nicastri M, Mancini P, De Seta D, Bertoli G, Prosperini L, Toni D, et al.
Efficacy of early physical therapy in severe Bell's palsy: A randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013;27:542-51.
Sullivan FM, Swan IR, Donnan PT, Morrison JM, Smith BH, McKinstry B, et al.
Early treatment with prednisolone or acyclovir in Bell's palsy. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1598-607.
[Table 1], [Table 2]