IPSIndian Journal of Pharmacology
Home  IPS  Feedback Subscribe Top cited articles Login 
Users Online : 3335 
Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Navigate Here
Resource Links
 »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
 »  Article in PDF (388 KB)
 »  Citation Manager
 »  Access Statistics
 »  Reader Comments
 »  Email Alert *
 »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

In This Article
 »  Abstract
 » Introduction
 »  Materials and Me...
 » Results
 » Discussion
 » Acknowledgement
 »  References
 »  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded346    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 11    

Recommend this journal


 Table of Contents    
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 44  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 225-229

Antiproliferative and antioxidant activity of Aegle marmelos (Linn.) leaves in Dalton's Lymphoma Ascites transplanted mice

1 Division of Herbal Drug Development, Centre For P.G Studies, Ultra College of Pharmacy, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Pharmacology, Centre For P.G Studies, Ultra College of Pharmacy, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India
3 Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Centre For P.G Studies, Ultra College of Pharmacy, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Submission29-Mar-2011
Date of Decision05-Oct-2011
Date of Acceptance01-Jan-2012
Date of Web Publication16-Mar-2012

Correspondence Address:
Vijaya Chockalingam
Division of Herbal Drug Development, Centre For P.G Studies, Ultra College of Pharmacy, Madurai, Tamil Nadu
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0253-7613.93854

Rights and Permissions

 » Abstract 

Objective: The present investigation was performed to evaluate the antiproliferative and antioxidant activity of Aegle marmelos leaves in Dalton's Lymphoma Ascites (DLA)-bearing mice.
Materials and Methods: The DLA cells maintained in vivo in Swiss albino mice were used for developing ascitic tumor in mice by intraperitoneal transplantation. The standardized 50% ethanolic extract of A. marmelos leaves (AMEE) was administered intraperitoneally in dose levels 200 and 400 mg/kg, after 24 hours of tumor inoculation in mice for two weeks.
Results: The AMEE treatment significantly prevented (P<0.001) the increase in body weight due to tumor cell growth and increased the mean survival time of the tumor-bearing mice as compared to the untreated DLA control mice. The treatment of DLA-bearing mice brought down the Alanine Aminotransferase (ALAT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (ASAT), and alkaline phosphatase to normal levels. The extract decreased the levels of hepatic lipid peroxidation and increased the levels of hepatic antioxidants Glutathione, Superoxide Dismutase (SOD), and catalase. All the changes observed with AMEE treatment were dose dependent.
Conclusion: The hydroalcoholic extract of A. marmelos exhibits strong antitumor and antioxidant activities in DLA-bearing mice.

Keywords: Aegle marmelos , antioxidant activity, antiproliferative activity, Dalton′s Lymphoma Ascites

How to cite this article:
Chockalingam V, Kadali SS, Gnanasambantham P. Antiproliferative and antioxidant activity of Aegle marmelos (Linn.) leaves in Dalton's Lymphoma Ascites transplanted mice. Indian J Pharmacol 2012;44:225-9

How to cite this URL:
Chockalingam V, Kadali SS, Gnanasambantham P. Antiproliferative and antioxidant activity of Aegle marmelos (Linn.) leaves in Dalton's Lymphoma Ascites transplanted mice. Indian J Pharmacol [serial online] 2012 [cited 2023 Sep 28];44:225-9. Available from: https://www.ijp-online.com/text.asp?2012/44/2/225/93854

 » Introduction Top

Oxidative stress is a known mediator of cancer. [1] Reactive oxygen species such as organic and hydrogen peroxides have been shown to act as tumor promoters. [2] Antioxidants have been demonstrated to serve as subcellular messengers of normal cell function and have a significant protective role against oxidative injury. [1] Consequently, the search of anticancer agents possessing antioxidant potential is worthy in terms of combined benefits of inhibition of proliferation and scavenging the toxicants inducing oxidative stress in cancer.

Aegle marmelos (L) known as bael has been reported to possess anticancer activity in different human cell lines, including Leukemia K562, T-lymphoid Jurkat, B-lymphoid Raji, Erythroleukemia HEL, Melanoma Colo 38, breast cancer MCF7, and MDA MB-231 cell lines, [3] and it has also been observed to inhibit proliferation of transplanted Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma in mice. [4] The plant extract exhibited cytotoxicity against tumor cell lines in brine shrimp lethality assay and Methyl Thiazolyl Tetrazolium (MTT)-based assay. [5] The A. marmelos leaf extract pretreatment in isoproterenol-treated rats increased the activities of antioxidant enzymes Superoxide Dismutase (SOD), catalase, and glutathione peroxidase in the heart tissue. [6] However, so far no reports are available on antitumor and antioxidant activity of the plant in Dalton's Lymphoma Ascites (DLA)-bearing mice. Hence, the present study was undertaken to obtain an insight into the antitumor and antioxidant potential of 50% alcoholic extract of A. marmelos leaves.

 » Materials and Methods Top


Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS), trichloroacetic acid, Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (E.Merck, Mumbai), 5,5'- bithio-bis-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB) (Sigma Lab, USA), Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide (NADH), phenazonium methosulfate, Thiobarbituric Acid (TBA), Nitroblue Tetrazolium (NBT), Tris-hydrochloride, and EDTA (Otto chemicals, Mumbai) were procured from standard suppliers of chemicals. Other chemicals and reagents used were of analytical grade.

Plant Material Collection and Extraction

The A. marmelos leaves were collected from Natham area, Dindigul, Tamil Nadu, and authenticated by Dr. Stephen, Department of Botany, American College, Madurai. They were cleaned to remove contaminants and shade dried. The dried leaves were then powdered coarsely and extracted with 50% ethanol by maceration at room temperature for one week. The macerate was concentrated by vacuum distillation and freeze dried (Martin Christ, Alphal-2) for 48 hours. The dry hygroscopic extract (12% w/w) of A. marmelos Leaves Ethanolic Extract (AMEE) was stored in a desiccator until use. Tannins, flavonoids, and saponins are the phytoconstituents present in the extract. The flavonoid content of the extract was estimated by the method of Chia-Chi Chang et al., [7] which was 0.98% ± 0.07% w/w equivalent to rutin as the standard flavonoid.

Experimental Animals

The protocol used in this study for use of mice as animal model for cancer was approved by the Institutional Animal Ethical Committee, Ultra College of Pharmacy, Madurai [UCP/IAEC/2007/010].

Swiss albino mice of age about 8 weeks, with an average body weight of 24 ± 2 g were used in the experiment. The animals were bred and brought up in our laboratory facility with 12-h cycles of light and dark at 23°C. They were fed standard laboratory diet (AMRUT Rat and Mice feed) and were given Reverse Osmosis (RO) purified water ad libitum.

DLA-induced Ascitic Antitumor Studies

The DLA cells were supplied by Amala Cancer Research Centre, Trissur, Kerala. The cells were maintained in vivo in Swiss albino mice by intraperitoneal (i.p.) transplantation. The tumor cells aspirated by phosphate buffer saline from the peritoneal cavity of the mice were administered intraperitoneally to all animals to develop ascitic tumor, except those in the normal group.

Antitumor activity was carried out in Swiss albino mice (8-10 weeks). Five groups of Swiss albino mice (24 ± 2 g), six animals in each group were taken. All groups of mice, except those from the normal group, were injected DLA cells in the intraperitoneal cavity and the treatment was started after 24 hr of tumor inoculation. The animals had free access to water and food.

The designation of the animal groups and treatment details are as follows.

All the treatments were started 24 hr after tumor inoculation and continued for 14 days (2 weeks). The body weight of animals in all groups during the treatment was noted daily. After the last dose and on the next day after 18 hr fasting, blood samples were collected by cardiac puncture from three animals in each group, after euthanasia effected by cervical dislocation under thiopentone sodium anesthesia. The remaining animals were kept to check the survival time of DLA-bearing mice.

Tumor Growth Response

The antitumor activity of the alcoholic extract of A. marmelos was measured in DLA-bearing mice with respect to the parameters viz. body weight, ascites tumor volume, Packed Cell Volume (PCV), Mean Survival Time (MST), and Percentage Increase in Life Span (days) (PILS).

MST=(Day of first death+Day of last death)/2

PILS=[(MST of treated group/MST of control group)−1] × 100

Hematological Profile and Serum Biochemical Parameters Estimation

The Hemoglobin (Hb) content, Red Blood Cell (RBC) count, total WBC count, and WBC differential count of the collected blood samples were estimated. The sera were analyzed for Alanine Aminotransferase (ALAT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (ASAT), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), and total protein content.

Evaluation of In Vivo Antioxidant Status

After collecting the blood samples from the sacrificed mice, the livers were collected, excised, rinsed in ice-cold normal saline, followed by ice-cold 10% KCl solution, blotted, dried, and weighed. A 10% homogenate was prepared in 10% KCl solution and was used for estimation of total proteins [8] and lipid peroxidation. [9] A part of the homogenate after precipitating proteins with Trichloroacetic acid was used for estimation of glutathione (GSH). [10] The remaining homogenate was centrifuged at 1,500 rpm for 15 min at 4°C. The supernatant obtained was used for estimation of SOD [11] and catalase. [12]

Statistical Analysis

The mean values of all parameters were compared for statistical significance by one-way Analysis Of Variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey-Kramer Multiple comparison test.

 » Results Top

Phenols, tannins, flavonoids, and saponins are the phytoconstituents present in AMEE. The flavonoid content of the extract is 0.98% ± 0.07% w/w equivalent to rutin as the standard flavonoid.

Effect of AMEE on Body Weight and Tumor Parameters

The mean body weight of the DLA group mice (33 g) increased as compared to that of normal mice (24 g). AMEE treatment in two dose levels (200 and 400 mg/kg) significantly (P<0.001) inhibited this increase in body weight in DLA mice [Table 1]. There was also significant (P<0.001) reduction in tumor volume and PCV in the AMEE-treated DLA mice group as compared to that in the DLA control group [Table 1]. Mean survival time and life span of the DLA-bearing mice were increased in AMEE-treated groups in a dose-dependent manner [Table 1].
Table 1: Effect of AMEE treatment on body weight and tumor growth in DLA-bearing mice

Click here to view

Effect of AMEE on Hematological Parameters of DLA-Bearing Mice

The hemoglobin content and RBC count were reduced in DLA-bearing mice as compared to normal animals. The reduction in the Hb content was inhibited by AMEE treatment significantly (P<0.05) at both dose levels (200 and 400 mg/kg), which is comparable to that of standard vincristine treatment. The reversal of the change in RBC count by AMEE treatment was observed with a greater significance (P<0.001). There was an increase in WBC count in DLA control mice as compared to that in normal mice. AMEE treatment in DLA-bearing mice inhibited this increase, as shown by the restoration to normal values. Reduction in lymphocytes count and rise in the number of polymorphs were the changes noticed in DLA-bearing mice when compared to normal mice. These changes were reversed to normal by AMEE treatment significantly (P<0.001) at the doses 200 and 400 mg/kg [Table 2].
Table 2: Effect of AMEE treatment on hematological parameters and serum biochemical parameters in DLA-bearing mice

Click here to view

Effect of AMEE on Serum Biochemical Parameters

The levels of ALAT, ASAT, and ALP were increased in DLA control group as compared to that in normal animals, whereas the protein content in serum of DLA control animals was decreased [Table 2]. AMEE treatment at 200 and 400 mg/kg produced significant reduction (P<0.001) in the levels of ALAT, ASAT, and ALP as compared to that in DLA control [Table 2].

Effect of AMEE on Lipid Peroxidation and GSH in DLA-bearing Mice

The lipid peroxidation in liver tissues of the DLA control group was significantly increased (P<0.001) as shown by higher values of Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances (TBARS [Malondialdehyde (MDA)] as compared to that in normal mice. Treatment with AMEE at 200 and 400 mg/kg significantly (P<0.001) reduced the MDA levels when compared with DLA control animals [Table 3]. The GSH levels in livers of tumor-bearing mice were significantly (P<0.001) decreased when compared with those in the normal group. The reduced level of GSH was found to increase on administration of AMEE when compared with the DLA control group [Table 3]. Total protein levels in AMEE-treated groups as well as standard treated groups increased as compared to significant reduction (P<0.001) in DLA control animals [Table 3].
Table 3: Effect of AMEE on liver antioxidant status in DLA-bearing mice

Click here to view

Effect of AMEE on Antioxidant Enzymes of DLA-bearing Mice

There was significant (P<0.001) reduction in the levels of liver SOD and catalase in DLA control animals. Administration of AMEE at two different dose levels (200 and 400 mg/kg) resulted in a significant increase (P<0.001) in the levels of SOD and catalase as compared with that noted in DLA control animals [Table 3].

 » Discussion Top

The quantitative criteria used in the present antiproliferative screening in DLA-bearing mice are retardation of primary tumor growth and extension of survival time of the tumor-bearing animals.

The body weight of DLA-bearing mice increased due to increase in ascitic tumor volume and inhibition of this increase in body weights by AMEE treatment shows its protective role in prevention of tumor growth. During the two-week period of the study after DLA inoculation, the ascitic fluid collection was rapid in untreated mice, indicating active secretion and accumulation of ascitic fluid in the abdomen due to excess tumor growth. The significant lowering of tumor ascitic volume by AMEE treatment clearly indicates that AMEE has the potential to retard tumor growth.

In case of ascites tumors, the measurement of the total amount of tumor cell material in the ascitic fluid can be done in terms of total cell volume or PCV or ascitocrit. [13] PCV may be considered comparable to that volume of solid tumors. Ascitocrit has been observed to be low in AMEE-treated group as compared to DLA control, and this inhibition of infiltration of cells was observed to be dose dependent.

AMEE treatment prolonged the life span of tumor bearing mice, which may have resulted because of the inhibition of tumor proliferation.

The hematological changes in cancer include anemia, [14] and the association of increased WBC count with lymphocyte predominance is common in ascites tumor. [15] AMEE treatment in DLA-bearing mice could normalize the blood cell profile, as shown by the increased hemoglobin content and RBC count with reduced WBC count [Table 2]. This clearly indicates the protective action of AMEE on the hemopoietic system.

The total protein content in both extract-treated group mice increased as compared to that in the DLA control group mice. The standard treated group showed almost near values as the normal group. The serum levels of ALT, AST, and ALP were sharply increased in DLA control, as these enzymes are the indicators of liver inflammation caused by peritoneal tumor ascites collection. Treatment with AMEE at the doses of 200 and 400 mg/kg produced almost normal values, thus signifying the reversal of tissue damage.

The liver proteins of the treated group are significantly higher than the untreated DLA control, but not elevated to normal levels similar to standard treatment [Table 3]. The prolongation of the treatment with AMEE may normalize the liver proteins.

The liver of EAC tumor-bearing mice, during the early phase after tumor implantation, has been found to be subjected to an oxidative stress with increased steady state levels of peroxyl radicals and reduced activities of antioxidant enzymes SOD and glutathione peroxidase. [16] The same observation has been made in the present study as indicated by a significant reduction in SOD, catalase, and GSH levels of livers of DLA tumor-bearing mice. The first-line defense component of the antioxidant system includes SOD and catalase. SOD mainly acts by scavenging superoxide, an active oxygen radical, produced in different aerobic metabolism. Catalase is a tetrameric enzyme present in most of the cells and acts by catalyzing the decomposition of H 2 O 2 to water and oxygen. The second line of defense comprises GSH, Vitamin C, Vitamin E, carotenoids, and flavonoid. [17] AMEE administration inhibited the lowering of antioxidant levels in livers of DLA-bearing mice demonstrating the potential of AMEE in attenuation of oxidative stress through quenching of free radicals, thus maintaining normal levels of endogenous antioxidant markers.

The level of lipid peroxidation has been reported to increase during oxidative stress as well as in the malignant state. [18] The estimation of peroxidation of lipids is carried out by determining the levels of TBARS (MDA) in peroxidised lipid systems because of its simplicity and sensitivity. [19] The comparative lower levels of MDA in the AMEE-treated group confirm the antioxidant activity of the extract.

Phenol content of AMEE might have contributed to its antioxidant activity. [20],[21] The antioxidant potential of AMEE in DLA-bearing animals may be attributable to its flavonoid content, as it has been proved in a previous study that quercetin, a flavonoid, exerted hepatic anticancer effect that could be interpreted via oxidant/antioxidant state of the liver. [22] Similarly, the antitumor activity exhibited by some plant extracts have been attributed to antioxidant principles, which modulated lipid peroxidation and augmented antioxidant defense system in Ehrlich Ascite carcinoma bearing mice. [23],[24],[25]

Therefore, it can be concluded that 50% alcoholic extract of A. marmelos exhibits strong antiproliferative and antioxidant activities in DLA tumor-transplanted mice.

 » Acknowledgement Top

The authors thank Prof K R Arumugam, Chairman, Ultra Trust, Madurai, and Prof A Babu Thandapani, Vice Chairman, Ultra Trust, Madurai, for providing the facilities to carry out this work.

 » References Top

1.Upham BL, Wagner JG. Toxicological Highlight: Toxicant induced oxidative stress in cancer. Toxicol Sci 2001;64:1-3.  Back to cited text no. 1
2.Slaga TJ, Klein-Szanto AJ, Triplett LL, Yotti LP, Trosko JE. Skin-tumour promoting activity of benzoyl peroxide, a widely used free radical-generating compound. Science 1981;213:1023-5.  Back to cited text no. 2
3.Lampronti I, Martello D, Bianchi N, Borgatti M, Lambertini E, Piva R, et al. in vitro anti-proliferative effects on human tumour cell lines of extracts from the Bangladeshi medicinal plant: Aegle marmelos Correa. Phytomedicine 2003;10:300-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
4.Jagetia GC, Ponemone V, Baliga MS. Aegle Marmelos (L) Correa inhibits the proliferation of transplanted Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma in Mice. Biol Pharm Bull 2005;28:58-64.  Back to cited text no. 4
5.Costa-Lotufo LV, Khan MT, Ather A, Wilke DV, Jimenez PC, Pessoa C, et al. Studies of the anticancer potential of plants used in Bangladeshi folk medicine. J Ethnopharmacol 2005;99:21.  Back to cited text no. 5
6.Rajadurai M, Padmanabhan M, Prince PS. Effect of Aegle Marmelos leaf extract and α-tocopherol on lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in isoproterenol induced myocardial infarction in rats. Singapore Med J 2005;46:78.  Back to cited text no. 6
7.Chang CC, Yang MI, Wen H, Ciiern J. Estimation of total flavonoid content in propolis by two complementary colorimetric methods. J Food Drug Anal 2002;10:178-82.  Back to cited text no. 7
8.Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 1951;193:265.  Back to cited text no. 8
9.Ohkawa M, Ohishi N, Yagi K. Assay of lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal Biochem 1979;95:351-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
10.Beutler E, Kelly BM. The effect of sodium nitrite on red cell glutathione. Experientia 1963;19:96-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
11.Kakkar R, Subrahmanyam V, Jasim R, Karla J. Increased oxidative stress in rat liver and pancreas during progression of streptozotocin induced diabetes. Clin Sci 1998;94:623-32.  Back to cited text no. 11
12.Maehly AC, Chance B. The assay of catalase and peroxide. In: Glick D, editors. Methods of Biochemical Analysis. Vol. 1. New York: Interscience; 1954. p. 357-424.  Back to cited text no. 12
13.Sassenrath EN. Total packed cell volume as a measure of growth retardation in mouse ascites tumours. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1958;76:601-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
14.Jelic S. Management of hematological complications of malignancy and chemotherapy: The rate of hematopoietic growth factors. Arch Oncol 2004;12:177-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
15.Kufe DW, Pollock RE, Weichselbaum RR, Bast RC, Gansler TS, Holland JF, et al. Cancer Medicine. 6 th ed. Hamillon (ON): BC Decker; 2003.  Back to cited text no. 15
16.Boveris A, Leesuy SF, Fraga C. Increased liver chemiluminescence in tumour - bearing mice. J Free Radic Biol Med 1985;1:131-8.  Back to cited text no. 16
17.Tiwari A. Antioxidant: New - generation therapeutic base for treatment of polygenic disorders. Curr Sci 2007;86:1092-102.  Back to cited text no. 17
18.Diplock AT, Evans CA, Burdon RH. Is there a significant role for lipid peroxidation in the causation of malignance and for antioxidants in cancer prevention? Proceedings of the 4 th International conference on anticarcinogenesis and radiation protection; 1993 April 18-23; Baltimore M.D.  Back to cited text no. 18
19.Halliwell B, Chirico S. Lipid peroxidation: Its mechanism, measurement and significance. Am Soc Clin Nutr 1993;25:715-6.  Back to cited text no. 19
20.Vijaya C, Ramanathan M, Subburaju T, Suresh B. Correlation of phenolic content and in vitro antioxidant activity of certain herbal extracts. Indian Drugs 2002;39:453-5.  Back to cited text no. 20
21.Kuete V, Mbaveng AT, Tsaffack M, Beng VP, Etoa F, Nkengfack AE, et al. Antitumour, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Bersama engleriana (Melianthaceae). J Ethnopharmacol 2008;115:494-501.  Back to cited text no. 21
22.Seufi AE, Ibrahim SS, Elmaghraby TK, Hafez EE. Preventive effect of the flavonoid, quercetin, on hepatic cancer in rats via oxidant/antioxidant activity: Molecular and histological evidences. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2009;28:80.  Back to cited text no. 22
23.Gupta M, Mazumder UK, SambathKumar R, Sivakumar T, Vamsi ML. Antitumour and antioxidant status of Caesalpinia bonducella against Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma in Swiss albino mice. J Pharmacol Sci 2004;94:177-84.  Back to cited text no. 23
24.Gupta M, Mazumder UK, SambathKumar R, Sivakumar T, Vamsi ML. Antitumour activity and antioxidant role of Bauhinia racemosa against Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma in Swiss Albino Mice. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2004;25:1070-6.  Back to cited text no. 24
25.Rajeshwar Y, Gupta M, Mazumder UK. Antitumour Activity and in vivo antioxidant status of Mucuna pruriens (Fabaceae) seeds against Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma in Swiss Albino Mice. Iran J Pharmacol Ther 2005;4:46-53.  Back to cited text no. 25


  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]

This article has been cited by
1 Optimization of Extraction Parameters for Enhanced Recovery of Bioactive Compounds from Quince Peels Using Response Surface Methodology
Vassilis Athanasiadis, Theodoros Chatzimitakos, Eleni Bozinou, Konstantina Kotsou, Dimitrios Palaiogiannis, Stavros I. Lalas
Foods. 2023; 12(11): 2099
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Potential of bioactive compounds derived from underutilized fruit-bearing plants: a comprehensive review
Inderjeet Kaur, Arun Dev Sharma, Mrinal Samtiya, Gema Pereira-Caro, Raquel Rodríguez-Solana, Tejpal Dhewa, José Manuel Moreno-Rojas
European Food Research and Technology. 2022;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Effects of Aegle marmelos (L.) methanolic leaf extracts on biochemical parameters in diabetic rats
RaviBabu Birudu, Padmavathi Pamulapati, SathishKumar Manoharan
Journal of Reports in Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2021; 10(2): 209
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Chemoprotective Effect of Boeravinone B against DMBA/Croton Oil Induced Skin Cancer via Reduction of Inflammation
Zuhong Wang, Sha Xiao, Jun Huang, Sutao Liu, Mei Xue, Fang Lu
Journal of Oleo Science. 2021; 70(7): 955
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Bioactive Compounds and Distinctive Pharmacological Activity Guided Review of Aegle marmelos: A Miraculous Plant of Indigenous Medicine System
Sourav Ghosh, Arvind Kumar, Neetu Sachan, Phool Chandra
Current Bioactive Compounds. 2020; 16(7): 965
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Evaluation of biochemical changes in diabetic rats treated with Aegle marmelos (L.) methanolic leaf extract
RaviBabu Birudu, Padmavathi Pamulapati, SathishKumar Manoharan
Pharmacognosy Research. 2020; 12(2): 127
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Dalton’s Lymphoma as a Murine Model for Understanding the Progression and Development of T-Cell Lymphoma and Its Role in Drug Discovery
Koiri Raj Kumar
International Journal of Immunotherapy and Cancer Research. 2017; : 001
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Chemopreventive efficacy of Aegle marmelos on murine transplantable tumors
George, S.K., Radhakrishnan, R., Kumar S., S., Sreelekha, T.T., Balaram, P.
Source of the Document Integrative Cancer Therapies. 2014; 13(1): 68-69
9 In vitro analysis of aegle marmelos leaf extracts on skin pathogens
Mathur, G., Roy, N., Mathur, A.
Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science. 2013; 3(10): 97-100
10 Effects of quince leaf extract on biochemical markers and coronary histopathological changes in rabbits
Khademi, F., Danesh, B., Delazar, A., Ghorbani, M., Soleimani Rad, J.
ARYA Atherosclerosis. 2013; 9(4): 223-231
11 Effect of Aegle marmelos (L.) Correa on alloxan induced early stage diabetic nephropathy in rats
Bhatti, R., Sharma, S., Singh, J., Singh, A., Ishar, M.P.S.
Indian Journal of Experimental Biology. 2013; 51(6): 464-469


Print this article  Email this article


Site Map | Home | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer | Privacy Notice
Online since 20th July '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow