IPSIndian Journal of Pharmacology
Home  IPS  Feedback Subscribe Top cited articles Login 
Users Online : 11719 
Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Navigate Here
  Next article
  Previous article 
  Table of Contents
Resource Links
   Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
   Article in PDF (101 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

In This Article

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded205    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal

Year : 2004  |  Volume : 36  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 313-315

Pharmaceutical drug advertisements in national and international journals

Post Graduate Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, GMC, Jammu (J&K) - 180 001, India

Correspondence Address:
Post Graduate Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, GMC, Jammu (J&K) - 180 001, India
[email protected]

How to cite this article:
Tandon V, Gupta B M, Khajuria V. Pharmaceutical drug advertisements in national and international journals. Indian J Pharmacol 2004;36:313-5

How to cite this URL:
Tandon V, Gupta B M, Khajuria V. Pharmaceutical drug advertisements in national and international journals. Indian J Pharmacol [serial online] 2004 [cited 2023 May 30];36:313-5. Available from: https://www.ijp-online.com/text.asp?2004/36/5/313/12653

Recent advances in research and clinical experiences keep on changing the drug therapy for many diseases. Therefore, scientific information on new drugs and therapeutics is undoubtedly of paramount importance. Industry drug advertisements are intended to be persuasive rather than educational and it is not meant for educating the physicians in the use of drugs.[1] However, a busy doctor unable to find time to update himself may start relying on drug advertisements. The drug advertisements in journals usually give inadequate and substandard information.[2] Although this aspect had been explored in the past by many authors,[2],[3] in the present study, a retrospective comparative evaluation was carried out to analyze the drug information provided in pharmaceutical advertisements in national and international journals. For this purpose 54 advertisements from 50 issues of national journals and 50 advertisements from 50 issues of international (USA and UK) journals were selected and reviewed. The list of titles of national and international journals from which these advertisements were selected is shown in [Table - 1]. The journals selected were for the years 2001 to 2003 and included those from medicine and surgery. Only new drug advertisements were included while reminder/repeat advertisements were excluded in the present study. The information was collected using the format of drug information sheets suggested by the WHO's ethical criteria for medical drug promotion,[4] that included details about the brand name/non-proprietary name, pharmacological data, clinical information, pharmaceutical information and legal aspects. The percentage of advertisements providing information about each aspect was worked out. The data obtained from national and international journals were compared using the Chi-square test and P<0.05 was considered significant. The results are shown in [Table - 2].
The present study indicated differences in the drug information provided in the advertisements published by national and international journals. The advertisements in international journals provided more complete drug information as per the recommendation laid down by WHO in comparison to national journals. However, they were found to be deficient in providing information regarding some of the aspects like pharmacological effects (12%), mechanism of action (16%) and pharmacokinetic data (8%). Whereas, the information in the advertisements of the national journals was inadequate in nearly all aspects of pharmacological data, clinical information (0%), pharmaceutical information (0-33.3%) and legal aspects (0-11.11%). The main stress in national journals appeared to be on brand names (100%), indication (92%) and address of manufacturers (88.88%).
This discrepancy in the drug information provided by drug advertisements in national and international journals might possibly be due to different regulatory requirements of various countries. In India we have "The Drug And Magic Remedies Act 1954" with amendment in 1992 to take this aspect into account. The objective of this Act is to control advertisements which are false/misleading and objectionable. However, this Act is silent on ensuring the adequacy of drug information in new drug advertisements in journals; as a result the industry learnt to take advantage of the loopholes in the law.[3] We also have an organization of pharmaceutical manufacturers in India (OPPI), which is bound to follow a self-regulatory code of pharmaceutical marketing suggested by the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (IFPMA).[5] IFMPA suggests that full advertisements in print must include the name of the product, active ingredients, name and address of the company, an approved indication, dosage and method of use, contraindications, precautions and side-effects. In light of the present study how far this code is strictly followed in India cannot be precisely stated. Double standards might be adopted by pharmaceutical companies to follow this code in developing countries as suggested by Thawani, 2002,[3] but the present study surely indicates that the IFPMA code is followed strictly in developed countries like the USA and UK.
Regulatory requirements are different even in the various developed countries. The FDA in the USA, under the authority of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act lay down guidelines[6] for "product claim" ads to provide basic pharmacological information, including the name of product, uses, side-effects, contraindications, drug benefits with regard to safety and effectiveness, risk information, limitation of efficacy, limitation to use, product hazards, and management of overdosage. Further, these drug advertisements cannot be false or misleading and cannot omit material facts. Whereas the UK legislation[7] (The Medicines, Monitoring of Advertising, Amendment Regulations, 1999) requires the license number, supply classifications, name and address of the marketing authorization holder, name of the product, list of its active ingredients, indications, side-effects, precautions, contraindications, dosage form, method of use, warnings, and cost to be included in the advertisements meant for persons qualified to prescribe or supply. Moreover, there are agencies like the MCA (Medicine Control Agency) in the UK to ensure these regulations strictly.
In view of these discrepancies, we suggest that a uniform regulation and code should be followed and effectively supervised to overcome this problem. There is a need for every member country to follow WHO's ethical criteria for medical drug promotion strictly, so that new drugs are rationally used. Drug advertisements are not meant to educate doctors but due to lack of time they may be used for that purpose. Hence, it is important that comprehensive information be given in these advertisements.
Therefore, pharmaceutical companies, editorial offices of various national journals and the government must recognize this problem and ensure the adequacy of drug information in these advertisements, in the overall interests of healthcare of the society.

  Acknowledgement Top

The authors acknowledge Dr. R. K. Gupta, Professor, M.G. Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram Wardha, for his valuable ideas and suggestions to undertake the present study. 

  References Top

1.Nies AS. Principle of therapeutics. In: Hardman JG, Limbird LE, Gilman AG, editors. Goodman & Gilman's the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 10th Ed. New York: Mc Graw-Hill 2001. p. 64.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Wilkes MS, Doblin B, Shapiro M. Pharmaceutical advertisements in leading medical journals: Experts' assessments. Ann Intern Med 1992;116:912-9.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Thawani V. Drug promotion: Can self-regulation work? Indian J Pharmacol 2002;34:227-8.   Back to cited text no. 3    
4.World Health Organisation. Ethical criteria for medical drug promotion. Geneva: WHO 1988.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Guideline on IFPMA code of pharm marketing practices. Printed promotional material (serial online) (cited 2004 March 1). Available from: URL:http://www.indiaoppi.com/guipage6.htm  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Wrns. Advertising/Labeling Definitions. What must a prescription drug advertisement include (serial online)2003Jan(cited 2004 March 1).Available from:URL: http://www.fda.gov/cder/handbook/adverdef.htm  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Advertising and promotion of medicines in UK. Particulars to be included in advertisements to person qualified to prescribe or supply (serial online)1999 Nov(cited 2004 March 1).Available from: URL:http://www.mca.gov.uk/inforesources/publications/gn23/medic10.htm  Back to cited text no. 7    
Print this article  Email this article


Site Map | Home | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer | Privacy Notice
Online since 20th July '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow