| CORRESPONDENCE |
|
|
|
| Year : 2004 | Volume
: 36
| Issue : 1 | Page : 45 |
| |
Reply
B Gitanjali
IJP, JIPMER, Pondicherry, TN, India
Correspondence Address:
IJP, JIPMER, Pondicherry, TN, India
[email protected]
How to cite this article:
Gitanjali B. Reply. Indian J Pharmacol 2004;36:45 |
The views expressed by Chauhan are very valid. These views hold good for pre and para clinical subjects too. Though I do not want to sound pessimistic, I am not sure whether a single letter would have sufficient impact to initiate changes in the list of equipment proscribed by the MCI. Many more such letters would probably be needed before we see a visible change.
|
