Indian J Pharm Close
 

Figure 4: Renal tissue calcium content. Data are expressed as Mean±SEM. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 versus untreated healthy control (Group A) #P<0.05, ##P<0.01 versus lithiatic group (Group B). (A) Untreated healthy control, (B) lithiatic control, (C) rat treated with Musa paradisiaca pseudostem at 100 mg/kg, (D) rat treated with Musa paradisiaca pseudostem at 150 mg/kg, (E) rat treated with Musa paradisiaca pseudostem at 200 mg/kg, (F) rat treated with Musa paradisiaca pseudostem at 250 mg/kg, (G) rat treated with Musa paradisiaca pseudostem at 300 mg/kg, (H) rat treated with cystone at 100 mg/kg body weight

Figure 4: Renal tissue calcium content. Data are expressed as Mean±SEM. *<i>P</i><0.05, **<i>P</i><0.01 versus untreated healthy control (Group A) #<i>P</i><0.05, ##<i>P</i><0.01 versus lithiatic group (Group B). (A) Untreated healthy control, (B) lithiatic control, (C) rat treated with <i>Musa paradisiaca</i> pseudostem at 100 mg/kg, (D) rat treated with <i>Musa paradisiaca</i> pseudostem at 150 mg/kg, (E) rat treated with <i>Musa paradisiaca</i> pseudostem at 200 mg/kg, (F) rat treated with <i>Musa paradisiaca</i> pseudostem at 250 mg/kg, (G) rat treated with <i>Musa paradisiaca</i> pseudostem at 300 mg/kg, (H) rat treated with cystone at 100 mg/kg body weight