IPSIndian Journal of Pharmacology
Home  IPS  Feedback Subscribe Top cited articles Login 
Users Online : 1223 
Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Navigate Here
  Search
 
  
Resource Links
   Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
   Article in PDF (323 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
In This Article
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed187    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded7    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
 Table of Contents    
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 51  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 354
 

Comment on “scrutinizing predatory journals in pharmacology and calculating their predatory rate”


1 Kscien Organization for Scientific Research, Faculty of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Sulaimani; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimani, Kurdistan, Iraq
2 Kscien Organization for Scientific Research, Faculty of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimani, Kurdistan, Iraq
3 Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimani, Kurdistan, Iraq

Date of Submission23-Jul-2019
Date of Decision16-Oct-2019
Date of Acceptance20-Oct-2019
Date of Web Publication26-Nov-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Fahmi Hussein Kakamad
Doctor City, Sulaimani
Iraq
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijp.IJP_458_19

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Kakamad FH, Mohammed SH, Salih AM. Comment on “scrutinizing predatory journals in pharmacology and calculating their predatory rate”. Indian J Pharmacol 2019;51:354

How to cite this URL:
Kakamad FH, Mohammed SH, Salih AM. Comment on “scrutinizing predatory journals in pharmacology and calculating their predatory rate”. Indian J Pharmacol [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 16];51:354. Available from: http://www.ijp-online.com/text.asp?2019/51/5/354/271638




It was our interest to read Sharma et al.'s article about predatory journals in pharmacology.[1] In a categorical method, the authors assessed the predatory ratio of the pharmacology journals listed in the Beall list. This effort needs to be sanctified and motivated because the predators scattered countless unsound papers that weakened the medical practice.[2]

The critiques concerning the paper are as the followings. First, the authors stated that their criteria for selecting the predatory journals were included in the Beall's list. As it is clear for all, it has not been updated since January 2017.[1] This is a source of bias as predatory publishing is evolving and growing unceasingly. Furthermore, there are several journals and publishers that proved to be legitimate later that were mistakenly enlisted by Beall such as Frontiers and International Journal of Electrochemical Science.[3] The current recommendation is to use Kscien list which is a daily updating blacklist of Kscien Organization For Scientific Research.[3] A quick search in the Kscien list of predatory standalone journals showed more titles (22 vs. 21).[1] Second, the authors explored only the stand-alone list; this may also show error in the sampling as they missed predatory pharmacology journals from the list of the publishers. A speedy search in the predatory publishers (only letter A) found more than 50 journals containing pharma or pharmacology in their titles. Third, the authors used the modified work of Dadkhah and Bianciardi in which all the predatory features weighted almost equally. This is not a logic judgment and unsupported by data. For example, it is unfair to weigh the number of editors against fake metrics and false indexing. Simply, a journal may accidentally have few editors, but lying to deceive the authors (false indexing and/or fake metrics) is an intentional predatory feature.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Sharma K, Rani M, Sharma L. Scrutinizing predator journals in pharmacology and calculating their predatory rate. Indian J Pharmacol 2019;51:208-11.  Back to cited text no. 1
  [Full text]  
2.
Omer J, Mohammed SH, Salih RQ, Kakamad FH, Mikael TM, Mohammed KK, et al. Predatory journals in psychiatry. Lancet Psychiatry 2019;6:564-5.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Kakamad F, Mohammed S, Najar K, Qadr G, Ahmed J, Mohammed K, et al. Kscien's list; A new strategy to hoist predatory journals and publishers. Int J Surg Open 2019;17:5-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

Site Map | Home | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer
Online since 20th July '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow