IPSIndian Journal of Pharmacology
Home  IPS  Feedback Subscribe Top cited articles Login 
Users Online : 78 
Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Navigate Here
  Search
 
  
Resource Links
 »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
 »  Article in PDF (328 KB)
 »  Citation Manager
 »  Access Statistics
 »  Reader Comments
 »  Email Alert *
 »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
In This Article
 »  Abstract
 » Introduction
 »  Materials and Me...
 » Results
 » Discussion
 » Conclusions
 » Acknowledgement
 »  References
 »  Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1716    
    Printed75    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded106    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
 Table of Contents    
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 44  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 480-484
 

Vasoactive agent buflomedil up-regulated expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in a rat model of sciatic nerve crush injury


1 Department of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
2 Department of Neurotoxicology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
3 Department of Pathology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University-210018, Nanjing, China
4 Department of Statistics, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

Date of Submission21-Dec-2010
Date of Decision20-Feb-2012
Date of Acceptance30-Apr-2012
Date of Web Publication3-Aug-2012

Correspondence Address:
Hang Xiao
Department of Neurotoxicology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing
China
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: Medical Research Council [grant number: Natural science of Jiangsu province BK2001116]., Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0253-7613.99312

Rights and Permissions

 » Abstract 

Objectives: To study the effect of Buflomedil on the morphological repair on crush injury of sciatic nerve and also the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).
Materials and Methods: Rat sciatic nerves were crushed by pincers. All of the 400 Sprague Dawley rats were randomly divided into: Sham-operated; saline; saline + VEGF-antibody; Buflomedil; and Buflomedil + VEGF antibody groups. The expression of VEGF in dorsal root ganglia (DRGs), following crush injury to sciatic nerves, was studied by RT-PCR, immunohistochemistry. The effects of Buflomedil on expression of VEGF and repair of neural pathology were also evaluated.
Results: VEGF mRNA was significantly increased in Buflomedil and Buflomedil + VEGF-antibody groups, compared with other groups. The number of VEGF-positive neurons was significantly increased in the Buflomedil and the saline groups. Besides, Buflomedil also caused less pathological changes in DRGs.
Conclusions: The vasoactive agent Buflomedil may decrease the pathological lesion and improve the functional rehabilitation of peripheral nerves, which may correlate to upregulation of the expression of VEGF, following crush injury to the peripheral nerves.


Keywords: Crush injury, dorsal root ganglion, sciatic nerve, vascular endothelium growth factor, vasoactive agent


How to cite this article:
Tang JR, Wu L, Su JH, Zhang P, Yu LB, Xiao H. Vasoactive agent buflomedil up-regulated expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in a rat model of sciatic nerve crush injury. Indian J Pharmacol 2012;44:480-4

How to cite this URL:
Tang JR, Wu L, Su JH, Zhang P, Yu LB, Xiao H. Vasoactive agent buflomedil up-regulated expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in a rat model of sciatic nerve crush injury. Indian J Pharmacol [serial online] 2012 [cited 2020 Aug 10];44:480-4. Available from: http://www.ijp-online.com/text.asp?2012/44/4/480/99312



 » Introduction Top


It is known that crush injury to peripheral nerves can adversely affect neural microcirculation and capillary occlusion, [1] and can result in dysfunction of neural conduction. It has been reported by clinical and experimental studies that vasoactive treatment can alleviate the effects of lesions in peripheral nerves, [2],[3] and Buflomedil is an effective agent for treating disorders of peripheral nerves. [4],[5],[6],[7],[8] However, its mechanism is incompletely understood. In addition, it is known that the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) can protect against neuronal lesions in brain and spinal cord disorders. [9],[10],[11] In order to explore the protective mechanisms involved in vasoactive treatment on peripheral nerves after injury, the sciatic nerves of rats were crushed, and the effect of the vasoactive agent, Buflomedil, on expression of VEGF was evaluated.


 » Materials and Methods Top


Sciatic Nerve Injury In Rats

Total of 400 Sprague Dawley (SD) rats (200 males and 200 females, SPF grade, body weight 180-220 g, Shanghai Laboratory Animal Center, Shanghai, China) were randomly divided into: sham-operated (S-O); saline (S); saline + VEGF antibody (S + Ab); Buflomedil (B); and Buflomedil + VEGF antibody (B + Ab) groups. Each group included 80 rats (40 males and 40 females). All procedures were performed in accordance with the animal care guidelines of the Nanjing Medical University, which conform to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised, 1985). The rats were fixed onto rat plates after they were anesthetized with 10 ml/kg of 3% pentobarbital through intraperitoneal injection (ip). An incision was made in the right hind limb to expose the sciatic nerve. [12] In the S-O group, the incision was closed after exposure of the sciatic nerve. The sciatic nerves of the rats in other groups were clipped with artery forceps for 30 s, the pressure was then released and the incisions were closed. Routine antibiotics were given to prevent infections. The rats in the Buflomedil [Nanjing Jinling Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., batch number 021104, Nanjing, China] and VEGF antibody [Beijing Zhongsan Jinqiao Biotechnology Ltd., Beijing, China] groups were administered drugs (20 mg/ kg/d, approximately equal to five times in adult doses, ip) and rabbit IgG polyclonal VEGF antibody (diluted with saline to 1:100, 2 ml/d, ip), and an equivalent volume of saline (ip) was given to the rats in the saline group.

Separation of Dorsal Root Ganglia (DRGs)

The Dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) were separated immediately after the rats were sacrificed. The ribs were sheared along both sides of the spine, and the spine's lumbar and sacral segments and cauda equina were removed. The section was cut along the median line, the spine segments and DRGs were placed in culture dishes containing oxygen-enriched, saturated Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM), pH 7.4, the osmotic pressure was 340 mOsm/L DRGs.

Detection of vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA in DRG cells

The DRGs were taken at time points including: 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h, as well as on day 7 after crushing the sciatic nerves. Reverse transcribed-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed as guide of reverse transcribed kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA, TRIzol from Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The oligonucleotide primers for VEGF 165 were 5′-GAAGTGGTGAAGTTCATGGATGTC-3′ (forward) and 5′-CGATCGTTCTGTATCAGTCTTTCC-3′ (reverse), and amplified a 541 bp fragment; and for β-actin the primers were 5′-CGCTGCGCTGGTCGTCGACA-3′ (forward) and 5′-GTCACGCACGATTTCCCGCT-3′ (reverse), amplified a 619 bp fragment (Shanghai Shenggong Biotechnology limited-liability company, Shanghai, China). Amplification products were resolved by agarose (2%) gel homeothermic electrophoresis at 80 V for 30 min. The predicted sizes of the amplification products were observed after electrophoresis, under an ultraviolet lamp, and densitometry was done. Then, the index of mRNA (RI) was calculated (RI = VEGF mRNA density / β-actin density × 100%).

Detection of VEGF-positive neurons in DRGs

  1. Immunohistochemistry: The DRGs of each group were taken at 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h, and also on day 7 after crushing the sciatic nerves. They were treated by immunohistochemistrical technique (pv-6001 / 6002 immunohistochemistry kit from Beijing Zhongsan Jinqiao Biotechnology Ltd., China).
  2. Image analysis: Two specimens were randomly selected from each group at each time point and immunohistochemistry of VEGF was performed. A light microscope (× 400) was used to observe the number of cells with positive expression in each sample (five fields were randomly taken from each section to count the positive cells and the average value was calculated), and a comparison was conducted.
Pathological Examination

The rats in each group were sacrificed at week 4 after crush. The DRGs and sciatic nerves were separated according to the method previously described. The DRGs was stained by Hematoxylin-Eosin method. Examination of the DRGs was performed by light microscope.

Statistics

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, Bizinsight, Beijing, China) 11.5 was used, and P values < 0.05 were considered to be significant. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for comparisons. The quantitative VEGF mRNA and the number of cells expressing VEGF were consistent with normal distributions. The Student-Newman-Keuls analysis (SNK) method was used.


 » Results Top


vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA by RT-PCR

There was little expression of VEGF in all groups, 0 h after crushing, and no significant difference among them (P > 0.05). Compared with 0 h: (1) the VEGF mRNA levels were not different from the S-O group (P > 0.05); (2) VEGF mRNA from other groups increased at 3 h and 6 h (P < 0.01 at 6 h) after crushing, and the VEGF mRNA from the S, S + Ab, B and B + Ab groups at 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h were more than that at 0 h (P < 0.01); (3) VEGF mRNA peaked at 72 h and then decreased to baseline, such that there was no difference between 0 h and day 7 in each group (P > 0.05); (4) VEGF mRNA from the S, S + Ab, B and B + Ab groups were significantly more than that of the sham-operated group at 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h (P < 0.01); and (5) VEGF mRNA from the B and B + Ab groups were significantly more than that of the S group at 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h (P < 0.05), but there was no intragroup difference (P > 0.05). There was no difference between the S + Ab group and the S group (P > 0.05) [Figure 1]a, b.
Figure 1: (a-a) VEGF mRNA in sham-operated group (M marker, N negative) (a-b) VEGF mRNA in saline group (M marker, N negative) (a-c) VEGF mRNA in saline + VEGF-antibody group (M marker, N negative) (a-d) VEGF mRNA in Bufl omedil group (M marker, N negative) (a-e) VEGF mRNA in Bufl omedil + VEGF-antibody group (M marker, N negative) (a-f) b-actin (M marker, N negative) (b) VEGF mRNA by RT-PCR

Click here to view


VEGF-positive neurons in DRGs

There were only a few VEGF-positive neurons in the DRGs in the S-O group. In the B group, the number of VEGF-positive neurons began to increase at 6 h (P < 0.05), but at 12 h in the other groups (P < 0.01); the numbers peaked at 72 h (P < 0.01) and then started to decrease, returning to normal level on day 7. The VEGF-positive neurons in the B group were more compared with those of S group and B + Ab group (P < 0.05); however, the VEGF-positive neurons in S + Ab group were less than that of the S group (P < 0.05) [Figure 2]a, b.
Figure 2: (a-a) VEGF-positive neurons in DRGs in sham-operated group (a-b) VEGF-positive neurons in DRGs in saline group (a-c) VEGF-positive neurons in DRGs in saline + VEGF-antibody group (a-d) VEGF-positive neurons in DRGs in Bufl omedil group (a-e) VEGF-positive neurons in DRGs in Bufl omedil + VEGF-antibody group (b) VEGF-positive neurons in DRGs

Click here to view


Pathological changes of DRGs light microscopically

On week 4 after crushing, in the S and S + Ab groups, many neurons were lost, the neuronal degeneration, for example, the grumose chromosomes and nuclear pyknosis appeared, the nucleoli or even nuclear structure disappeared. The tigrolysis, vacuolar degeneration, and many apoptosis body appeared in the cytoplasm and glial cells proliferated. The pathological changes of the S + Ab group were more severe than those of the S group. In the B group, the mild nuclear pyknosis appeared, few apoptosis bodies appeared in the cytoplasm, and the other pathological changes were also less than those in the S group. The pathological changes in B + Ab group were severe than those in the B group. There was no pathological change of DRGs in the S-O group [Figure 3].
Figure 3: (a) Pathological changes of DRGs light microscopically on week 4 in sham-operated group (b) Pathological changes of DRGs light microscopically on week 4 in saline group (c) Pathological changes of DRGs light microscopically on week 4 in saline + VEGF-antibody group (d) Pathological changes of DRGs light microscopically on week 4 in Bufl omedil group (e) Pathological changes of DRGs light microscopically on week 4 in Bufl omedil + VEGF-antibody group

Click here to view



 » Discussion Top


Relevant research indicated that the expression of VEGF could be upregulated by anoxia. [13],[14],[15] The results of this experiment showed that with Buflomedil treatment, VEGF mRNA as well as VEGF-positive DRG neurons increased at 3 and 6 h (P < 0.01 at 6 h) after crushing, and both of them decreased to baseline on day 7 in this experiment. The findings demonstrated that the vasoactive agent, Buflomedil treatment in case of sciatic nerve injury would result in a momentary effect in the expression of VEGF and VEGF receptor in DRGs of rats after crush injury to sciatic nerves. It was interesting especially that the number of the VEGF plus VEGF receptor-positive DRG neurons increased with Buflomedil treatment, but decreased when the VEGF antibody was used. When VEGF-Ab was applied, they would combine with VEGF, and block the combination of VEGF with VEGF receptors. It is well-known that VEGF-Ab by itself would not influence the expression of VEGF. Therefore, VEGF mRNA remained unchanged in S and S+VEGF-Ab, as well as B and B+VEGF-Ab. However, VEGF-positive DRG neurons were different in S, or B group compared with S+VEGF-Ab, or B+VEGF-Ab, respectively, and this is due to some of the VEGF is occupied by VEGF-Ab. It is known that neuroprotection is one of the many important functions of VEGF in the course of injury-repair. The VEGF-positive DRG neurons in S+VEGF-Ab, or B+VEGF-Ab were decreased significantly compared with that in S, or B, respectively, in this experiment. The results suggested that this might be due to the biological activity of VEGF was inactivated or decreased when combined with the VEGF antibody. Taken together, the results, above, suggested that Buflomedil could upregulate VEGF and increase the combined expression of VEGF and VEGF receptors in DRGs after crush injury to sciatic nerves. It has been shown that VEGF was a key mediator of the angiogenesis in ischemic lesions in nervous tissues. [16],[17],[18] Uesaka demonstrated that angiogenesis is essential for the enlargement of any solid tumor, and VEGF is considered to be a major regulator. [19] Aramoto found that VEGF could induce mild vasodilation and obvious increases in microvascular permeability. [20] Recent evidence suggested that VEGF was protective against the effects of lesions in neurons or nerves in brain ischemia, [9],[10],[11],[16] spinal cord disorders [11],[21] and even impairment of peripheral nerves. [16],[21],[22],[23],[24]

Li [25] found that when neurolemma was dissected during facial nerve decompression, the edematous nerves would immediately bulge, the blood vessels of the epineurium became dilate, the color of the nerves turned from pale to red, and facial movement would recover dramatically. The results of pathology in this experiment indicated that Buflomedil could reduce the pathological injury and improve the functional recovery after crushing injury to sciatic nerves.


 » Conclusions Top


The outcomes of this study indicate that the vasoactive agent Buflomedil may decrease the pathological lesion of peripheral nerves and improve the rehabilitation of the neural function, which may relate to upregulation of the expression of VEGF, following crush injury to peripheral nerves.


 » Acknowledgement Top


This work was supported by the Medical Research Council [grant number: Natural science of Jiangsu province BK2001116].

 
 » References Top

1.Rydevik B, Lundborg G. Permeability of intraneural microvessels and perineurium following acute graded experimental nerve compression. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1977;11:179-87.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Bischoff B, Romstöck J, Fahlbusch R, Buchfelder M, Strauss C. Intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potential pattern and perioperative vasoactive treatment for hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma surgery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79:170-5.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Uehara K, Sugimoto K, Wada R, Yoshikawa T, Marukawa K, Yasuda Y, et al. Effects of cilostazol on the peripheral nerve function and structure in STZ-induced diabetic rats. J Diabet Complications 1997;11:194-202.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Dadure C, Motais F, Ricard C, Raux O, Troncin R, Capdevila X. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks at home for treatment of recurrent complex regional pain syndrome I in children. Anesthesiology 2005;102:387-91.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.Van den Brande P, Maurel A. A placebo-sham-operatedled study of the effects of intravenous Buflomedil on foot skin microcirculation in patients with severe intermittent claudication. Angiology 1998;49:105-14.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Marie I, Hervé F, Primard E, Cailleux N, Levesque H. Long-term follow-up of hypothenar hammer syndrome: A series of 47 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2007;86:334-43.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Mauad RJ, Shimizu MH, Mauad T, de Tolosa EM. Buflomedil and pentoxifylline in the viability of dorsal cutaneous flaps of rats treated with nicotine. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006;59:387-92.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Bouskela E, Cyrino FZ. Effects of a calcium antagonist and of the adrenergic system on spontaneous vasomotion and mean arteriolar diameter in the hamster cheek pouch: Influence of buflomedil. Int J Microcirc Clin Exp 1997;17:164-74.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Sun FY, Guo X. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of neuroprotection by vascular endothelium growth factor. J Neurosci Res 2005;79:180-4.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.Storkebaum E, Lambrechts D, Carmeliet P. VEGF: Once regarded as a specific angiogenic factor, now implicated in neuroprotection. Bioessays 2004;26:943-54.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.Kilic E, Kilic U, Wang Y, Bassetti CL, Marti HH, Hermann DM. The phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/Akt pathway VEGFs neuroprotective activity and induces blood brain barrier permeability after focal cerebral ischemia. FASEB J 2006;20:1185-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.Patro IK, Hattopadhyay M, Patrio N. Flunarizine enhances functional recovery following sciatic nerve crush lesion in rats. Neurosci Lett 1999;26:97-100.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Chodobski A, Chung I, KoŸniewska E, Ivanenko T, Chang W, Harrington JF, et al. Early neurotrophilic expression of VEGF after brain traumatic injury. Neuroscience 2003;122:853-67.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Kovács Z, Ikezaki K, Samoto K, Inamura T, Fukui M. VEGF and flt. expression time kinetics in rat brain infarct. Stroke 1996;27:1865-73.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Minamino T, Tateno K. Theraputic angiogenesis for critical limb ischemia by implantation of peripheral mononuclear cells. Med Devel (Jap) 2006;217:397-401.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Zachary I. Neuroprotective role of vascular endothelium growth factor: Signalling mechanisms, biological function, and therapeutic potential. Neurosignals 2005;14:207-21.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Kilic E, Kilic U, Wang Y, Bassetti CL, Marti HH, Hermann DM. VEGF overexpression induces post-ischemic neuroprotection, but facilitates haemodynamic steal phenomena. Brain 2005;128(Pt 1):52-63.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Shintani S, Murohara T. Theraputic angiogenesis by cell transplatation. Med Devel (Jap) 2006;217:392-6.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Uesaka T, Shono T, Suzuki SO, Nakamizo A, Niiro H, Mizoguchi M, et al. Expression of VEGF and its receptor genes in intracranial schwannomas. J Neurooncol 2007;83:259-66.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Aramoto H, Breslin JW, Pappas PJ, Hobson RW, Durán WN. Vascular endothelium growth factor stimulates differential signalling pathways in in vivo microvascular. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2004;287:H1590-8.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Ding XM, Mao BY, Jiang S, Li SF, Deng YL. Neuroprotective effect of exogenous vascular endothelium growth factor on rat spinal cord neurons in vivo hypoxia. Chin Med J (Engl) 2005;118:1644-50.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Park HW, Lim MJ, Jung H, Lee SP, Paik KS, Chang MS. Human mesenchymal stem cell-derived Schwann cell-like cells exhibit neurotrophic effects, via distinct growth factor production, in a model of spinal cord injury. Glia 2010;58:1118-32.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Hasegawa T, Kosaki A, Shimizu K, Matsubara H, Mori Y, Masaki H, et al. Amelioration of diabetic peripheral neuropathy by implantation of hematopoietic mononuclear cells in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Exp Neurol 2006;199:274-80.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Gosk J, Mazurek P, Reichert P, Wnukiewicz W, Rutowski R. The possibilities of using a non-degradable materials as conduits in peripheral nerve reconstructions. Polim Med 2010;40:4-8.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Li JD, Li XP. To survey microcirculation of facial nerve of rabbit by laser-Doppler flow imaging. J Chin Otolaryngol 2002;37:184-7.  Back to cited text no. 25
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

Site Map | Home | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer
Online since 20th July '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow