IPSIndian Journal of Pharmacology
Home  IPS  Feedback Subscribe Top cited articles Login 
Users Online : 1845 
Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Navigate Here
  Search
 
 » Next article
 » Previous article 
 » Table of Contents
  
Resource Links
 »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »  Article in PDF (104 KB)
 »  Citation Manager
 »  Access Statistics
 »  Reader Comments
 »  Email Alert *
 »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
In This Article
 »  Acknowledgments
 »  References
 »  Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3717    
    Printed139    
    Emailed4    
    PDF Downloaded210    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 5    

Recommend this journal

 


 
RAPID COMMUNICATION
Year : 2005  |  Volume : 37  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 261-262
 

Assessment of the pharmacological effect of silymarin on ethanol-induced DNA damage by single-cell gel electrophoresis


Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar - 608 002, India

Date of Submission06-Jun-2005
Date of Acceptance22-Jun-2005

Correspondence Address:
K V Pugalendi
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar - 608 002
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0253-7613.16578

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Saravanan R, Pugalendi K V. Assessment of the pharmacological effect of silymarin on ethanol-induced DNA damage by single-cell gel electrophoresis. Indian J Pharmacol 2005;37:261-2

How to cite this URL:
Saravanan R, Pugalendi K V. Assessment of the pharmacological effect of silymarin on ethanol-induced DNA damage by single-cell gel electrophoresis. Indian J Pharmacol [serial online] 2005 [cited 2019 Oct 18];37:261-2. Available from: http://www.ijp-online.com/text.asp?2005/37/4/261/16578


Consumption of alcohol is part of the human lifestyle almost worldwide. Ethanol oxidation gives rise to the generation of free radicals, both in vitro and in vivo , and such events are associated with the induction of DNA damage, for example, the DNA strand breaks and modification of DNA bases occurs.[1] Oxidative damage to DNA is of a great importance because of the growing recognition that such damage can both initiate and promote carcinogenesis. Epidemiological studies show that the consumption of alcoholic beverage carries an associated increased risk of several cancers in humans, and this risk increases with increasing levels of alcohol consumption.[2]

Silymarin is a standardized extract of flavonolignans (e.g., silybinin, isosilybinin, silydianin and silychristin) and other minor compounds from Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn. It is known to protect the liver against xenobiotic injury and to have a positive impact on the the course of liver diseases.[3] These compounds are consumed in substantial quantities by humans daily and are popularly used to treat alcoholics. Despite extensive research on the mechanisms by which it exerts its protective effects, the effect of silymarin on alcohol genotoxicity is still not known. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the effect of silymarin on ethanol-induced DNA damage in rat lymphocytes using single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay).

Male albino Wistar rats (140-160 g) were purchased and housed in the Central Animal House, Rajah Muthiah Medical College, Annamalai University. They had free access to tap water and standard laboratory rat chow (M/s. Pranav Agro Industries Ltd., Bangalore, India). The experimental and animal-handling procedures were approved by the institutional animal ethics committee (IAEC). They were randomly divided into three groups (n = 8) and treated as follows:

Group 1: Normal control.

Group 2: Rats received ethanol as a 20% aqueous solution, prepared using absolute alcohol, twice a day (2.5 mL/100 g, body weight) at 9.00 AM and 5.00 PM for 60 days by intragastric infusion.

Group 3: Rats were treated as group 2 and in addition were coadministered with silymarin for the last 30 days at the dose of 10 mg/kg, b.w., twice a day (because this dosage has been reported to offer maximum protection against various hepatotoxins).[4]

This experimental model was designed to mimic the lifestyle of alcoholics who come to hospital with alcohol-related problems and have medication without avoiding alcohol (because of addiction).

After 60 days, the rats were allowed to fast overnight, anaesthetized by the intramuscular injection of ketamine hydrochloride (24 mg/kg), and were sacrificed by cervical decapitation. Blood was collected in a heparinized tube and the lymphocytes were separated immediately by Ficol density gradient centrifugation using Histopaque-1077 (Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, MO, USA). Isolated lymphocytes were suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Salt (present in PBS) maintains the integrity of DNA by the repulsive electrostatic interactions between the negatively charged phosphate groups. Salt also shields this charge interaction and therefore stabilizes the duplex structure. The cell viability was measured by the trypan blue-exclusion method, and only the samples containing at least 95% viable lymphocytes were used for the experiments.

Alkaline single-cell gel electrophoresis was used to measure DNA damage (DNA strand breaks and base modifications) in freshly isolated lymphocytes.[5] In short, lymphocytes were embedded in agarose on a microscope slide, and lysed with triton X-100 and 2.5 M NaCl to produce nucleoids. During electrophoresis, in alkaline condition (0.3 M NaOH and 1 mM EDTA, pH 13), the DNA moves towards the anode, and this is more significant if breaks are present (as supercoils in the tightly packed nucleoids are relaxed under this condition), which gives it the appearance as a comet. After staining with SYBR gold, 25 cells from each slide were observed with a fluorescent microscope. The tail length of the comet and the tail moment (% of DNA in tail × tail length) were determined using the image-analysis software, Komet 5.0 (Kinetics Imaging Ltd., Liverpool, UK).

The results were expressed as mean±SD for eight rats in each group. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan's multiple range test (P<0.05).

In this study, the extent of DNA damage was quantified by measuring the displacement of the genetic material between the cell nucleus (comet head) and the resulting 'tail'. When the alkaline single-cell gel electrophoresis was introduced,[5] the tail length was used as an index of DNA damage. However, the introduction of computerized image analysis made it possible to calculate other features (such as tail moment) of the comet image as well, thereby providing better descriptions of the overall DNA damage. The significantly increased tail length and tail moment in alcohol-administered rats [Figure - 1] clearly shows the relation between alcohol consumption and DNA damage. These results are in correlation with many human and animal studies.[6] But, some human studies reported that alcohol consumption had no effect on DNA damage.[7] The reason for this discrepancy may be due to the difference in the amount or type of alcoholic beverage consumed and the nutritional status of the alcoholics.

Coadministration of silymarin significantly decreased the DNA damage (group 3) when compared with alcoholic rats (group 2). The treatment reversed the DNA damage to near normal levels (group 3) despite continued alcohol administration. Cessation of alcohol administration during the treatment period and/or the expansion of treatment period might provide better protection. The protective effect of silymarin can be explained by the scavenging of free radicals before they cause damage to nuclear DNA. In this context, Yu and Anderson[8] have shown the ability of silymarin to protect the DNA against reactive oxygen species-induced damage.

On the basis of this study, we suggest that silymarin is useful to treat alcoholic DNA damage, in addition to alcoholic liver injury. This report is likely to advance/add to the existing knowledge in relation to the treatment of alcoholics. Further, more clinical investigations are needed in human volunteers.


 » Acknowledgments Top


The authors are grateful to the Indian council of medical research (ICMR) for their financial support. The authors also thankful to Dr. Vickram R. Jayanth and Dr. Solomon F.D. Paul, Department of Human Genetics, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, India for their technical assistance.



 
 » References Top

1.Navasumrit P, Ward TH, Dodd N, O'Connor PJ. Ethanol induced free radicals and hepatic DNA strand breaks are prevented in vivo by antioxidants: effects of acute and chronic ethanol exposure. Carcinogenesis 2000;21:93-9.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Boffetta P, Garfinkel L. Alcohol drinking and mortality among men enrolled in an American Cancer Society prospective study. Epidemiology 1990;1:342-8.   Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  
3.Morazzoni P, Bombardelli E. Silybum marianum ( Cardus marianus ). Fitoterapia 1995;66:6-42.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Saraswat B, Visen PKS, Dayal R, Agarwal DP, Patnaik GK. Protective effect of ursolic acid against chemical induced hepato-toxicity in rats. Indian J Pharmacol 1996;28:232-9.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Singh NP, McCoy MT, Schneider EL. A simple technique for quantification of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res 1988;175:184-91.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  
6.Fedeli D, Fedeli A, Luciani F, Massi M, Falcioni G, Polidori C. Lymphocyte DNA alteration by sub-chronic ethanol intake in alcohol-preferring rats. Clinica Chimica Acta 2003;337:43-8.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
7.Zhu CQ, Lam TH, Jiang CQ. Lymphocyte DNA damage in bus manufacturing workers. Mutat Res 2001;491:173-81.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
8.Yu TW, Anderson D. Reactive oxygen species-induced DNA damage and its modification: A chemical investigation. Mutat Res 1997;379:201-10.  Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]


Figures

[Figure - 1]

This article has been cited by
1 The effects of dietary boric acid and borax supplementation on lipid peroxidation, antioxidant activity, and DNA damage in rats
Ince, S., Kucukkurt, I., Cigerci, I.H., Fatih Fidan, A., Eryavuz, A.
Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology. 2010; 24(3): 161-164
[Pubmed]
2 The effects of dietary boric acid and borax supplementation on lipid peroxidation, antioxidant activity, and DNA damage in rats
Sinan Ince,Ismail Kucukkurt,Ibrahim Hakki Cigerci,A. Fatih Fidan,Abdullah Eryavuz
Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology. 2010; 24(3): 161
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Anti- and pro-mutagenic effects of silymarin in the ames bacterial reverse mutation assay
Sampath Kaleeswaran, Padmanabhan Sriram, Daivasigamani Prabhu, Chinnathambi, Vijayakumar, Lalgudi Narayanan Mathuram
Phytotherapy Research. 2009; 23(10): 1378
[VIEW] | [DOI]
4 Silymarin protection against major reactive oxygen species released by environmental toxins: Exogenous H2O2 exposure in erythrocytes
Kiruthiga, P.V., Shafreen, R.B., Pandian, S.K., Devi, K.P.
Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology. 2007; 100(6): 414-419
[Pubmed]
5 Silymarin Protection against Major Reactive Oxygen Species Released by Environmental Toxins: Exogenous H2O2Exposure in Erythrocytes
P. V. Kiruthiga,R. Beema Shafreen,S. Karutha Pandian,K. Pandima Devi
Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology. 2007; 100(6): 414
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article

    

Site Map | Home | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer
Online since 20th July '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow