IPSIndian Journal of Pharmacology
Home  IPS  Feedback Subscribe Top cited articles Login 
Users Online : 2737 
Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Navigate Here
  Search
 
  Next article
  Previous article 
  Table of Contents
  
Resource Links
   Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
   Article in PDF (50 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
In This Article

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2022    
    Printed124    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded85    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 
CORRESPONDENCE
Year : 2004  |  Volume : 36  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 327
 

Reply


Department of Pharmacology, Chengalpattu Medical College, Chengalpattu - 603 001, India

Correspondence Address:
Department of Pharmacology, Chengalpattu Medical College, Chengalpattu - 603 001, India
drsivagnanam@rediffmail.com



How to cite this article:
Sivagnanam G. Reply. Indian J Pharmacol 2004;36:327


How to cite this URL:
Sivagnanam G. Reply. Indian J Pharmacol [serial online] 2004 [cited 2020 Jun 1];36:327. Available from: http://www.ijp-online.com/text.asp?2004/36/5/327/12662


Sir,
We thank S.K. Srivastava for his interest in our article and comments. Our explanations to his comments are given here:
1. It is pointed out that the title is misleading "as the knowledge of student has not been evaluated" - As regards the word 'knowledge' we have reproduced the Merriam-Webster's dictionary meaning. We think we need not elaborate further on this point since we can't think of a more apt title. The relevant 'knowledge' of the students was assessed only after completion of the concerned topic e.g. General Pharmacology. Novel because, as per our information, such a method has not been tested earlier.
The dictionary statement for 'knowledge': "the fact or condition of knowing something with familiarity gained through experience or association (2): acquaintance with or understanding of a science, art, or technique b (1): the fact or condition of being aware of something (2): the range of one's information or understanding c: the circumstance or condition of apprehending truth or fact through reasoning"
2. The dictionary statement for 'novel': "1: New and not resembling something formerly known or used 2: original or striking especially in conception or style". This answers part of the second query "i.e. on what basis the authors are concluding that it is a novel TLM".
3. It would be better "If this (crossword puzzle) TLM was compared with other standard TLMs". Agreed, but our intention was not to compare our method with standard procedures nor do we claim that ours is the sole or superior TLMs. The fact that it was not compared with a standard procedure doesn't mean that our method is 'irrelevant' or 'meaningless'. But we agree that such a comparison would have added strength.
4. "Whether the crossword puzzle as a method of evaluation can be compared with evaluation by MCQ test". A good idea but each method has its own advantages and limitations.
5. Further, we have not claimed it as an 'Evaluation' method despite the fact that the TLM involves assessment of knowledge. Our main purpose was to gauge the interest evoked by this method among the students and testing the 'knowledge' was secondary. 

Top
Print this article  Email this article

    

Site Map | Home | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer
Online since 20th July '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow