IPSIndian Journal of Pharmacology
Home  IPS  Feedback Subscribe Top cited articles Login 
Users Online : 1927 
Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Navigate Here
 ╗   Next article
 ╗   Previous article
 ╗   Table of Contents

Resource Links
 ╗   Similar in PUBMED
 ╗  Search Pubmed for
 ╗  Search in Google Scholar for
 ╗Related articles
 ╗   Citation Manager
 ╗   Access Statistics
 ╗   Reader Comments
 ╗   Email Alert *
 ╗   Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3320    
    Printed123    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded475    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 

 SHORT COMMUNICATION
Year : 1996  |  Volume : 28  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 185-187

Bioavailability of diclofenac sodium: comparison of rectal suppositories with oral suspension in rabbits



Correspondence Address:
Ramkrishna Sistla


Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Compressed rectal suppositories which are suitable and stable in tropical climates were formulated using diclofenac sodium, a potent NSAID, in polyethylene glycol 4000 base. These suppositories were evaluated for pharmacokinetic performance in rabbits at the dose of 10 mg/kg and the results were compared with those obtained after oral administration. A computer programme using model independent formulae was used to calculate different pharmacokinetic parameters. There was no difference in pharmacokinetic parameters such as Cmax, AUC0-(, t1/2 and the mean residence time (MRT) between oral and rectal formulations. But tmax was faster in case of oral administration (0.58˝ 0.08 h vs 1.08˝ 0.15 h, P < 0.05) indicating quicker drug absorption from oral suspension. Relative rectal bioavailability was 98.35˝ 3.58% which indicates comparable pharmacokinetic performance of rectal suppositories of diclofenac sodium in rabbits.






[PDF]*


        
Print this article     Email this article

Site Map | Home | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer
Online since 20th July '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow